<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rejection Follow-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/</link>
	<description>A place for people who love, read and write children's literature.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cassandra</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-2029</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-2029</guid>
		<description>Wow. Who knew people would ruin their reputation and relationships with potential agents by throwing temper tantrums! Thanks for this great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Who knew people would ruin their reputation and relationships with potential agents by throwing temper tantrums! Thanks for this great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kidlit.com &#183; Rejection Follow-up Part 2</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Kidlit.com &#183; Rejection Follow-up Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>[...] my earlier blog post about rejection follow-up, I covered two responses I frequently get to just your run-of-the-mill rejection. But, as I said a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my earlier blog post about rejection follow-up, I covered two responses I frequently get to just your run-of-the-mill rejection. But, as I said a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>jtuttle -- Some agents only take queries, so that's the only submission they usually receive. Of course they (or an assistant) read them. And some agents are faster than others, they really love that clean inbox. A book isn't all about the writing, which is probably something I should post about. If the rejection seemed super quick, that's probably because something else about the genre or story didn't resonate with the agent. I take on very little high fantasy, for example. If the idea or the story doesn't grab me, I'll reject more quickly because I know it's not something I'm interested in. I wouldn't be the right advocate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jtuttle &#8212; Some agents only take queries, so that&#8217;s the only submission they usually receive. Of course they (or an assistant) read them. And some agents are faster than others, they really love that clean inbox. A book isn&#8217;t all about the writing, which is probably something I should post about. If the rejection seemed super quick, that&#8217;s probably because something else about the genre or story didn&#8217;t resonate with the agent. I take on very little high fantasy, for example. If the idea or the story doesn&#8217;t grab me, I&#8217;ll reject more quickly because I know it&#8217;s not something I&#8217;m interested in. I wouldn&#8217;t be the right advocate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtuttle</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>jtuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>What about if you get a form rejection after sending JUST a query letter (no part of the manuscript)) and you get a rejection moments after you send it. How can an agent tell what your writing is like from the query? Did the agent even read the query? I wonder about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about if you get a form rejection after sending JUST a query letter (no part of the manuscript)) and you get a rejection moments after you send it. How can an agent tell what your writing is like from the query? Did the agent even read the query? I wonder about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie Carroll</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>I always respond when an agent or editor gives me a personal rejection. I have these little notecards that I use to send a handwritten thank you via snail mail. I keep them very short and to the point. I started doing this after reading Carolyn See's book "Making a Literary Life."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always respond when an agent or editor gives me a personal rejection. I have these little notecards that I use to send a handwritten thank you via snail mail. I keep them very short and to the point. I started doing this after reading Carolyn See&#8217;s book &#8220;Making a Literary Life.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1198</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-1198</guid>
		<description>Kim -- Good question. I write a post about this, so watch out for that in the next couple weeks, my blogging schedule is a little cramped right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim &#8212; Good question. I write a post about this, so watch out for that in the next couple weeks, my blogging schedule is a little cramped right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Baccellia</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1183</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Baccellia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-1183</guid>
		<description>Ok, I have a question.  When an agent has rejected a requested full or partial is it ok to send a thank you email or letter?  Especially if they give personal feedback?  I'm reading that some agents say not to do this.  What do you suggest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I have a question.  When an agent has rejected a requested full or partial is it ok to send a thank you email or letter?  Especially if they give personal feedback?  I&#8217;m reading that some agents say not to do this.  What do you suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1178</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-1178</guid>
		<description>This is nice to know, because I've only ever responded to a rejection when it seemed so specific and personal and kind.  It was an ejection, and it prompted me to write a snail mail thank you-I really appreciated her time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nice to know, because I&#8217;ve only ever responded to a rejection when it seemed so specific and personal and kind.  It was an ejection, and it prompted me to write a snail mail thank you-I really appreciated her time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beth</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>I...cannot fathom doing either of these. It always astounds me when people are so unprofessional! The only time I've ever responded to a rejection was when I was writing a thank you for personal feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8230;cannot fathom doing either of these. It always astounds me when people are so unprofessional! The only time I&#8217;ve ever responded to a rejection was when I was writing a thank you for personal feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2009/10/13/rejection-follow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=662#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>Meradeth -- Personal preference operates on a level far above and beyond what I deal with in the slush. 99% of the queries I get, I'll reject because the writing isn't strong enough or the idea isn't saleable. I'm not saying that "not for me" is the euphemism for weak writing across the board, but it is the most frequent reason for rejection for me. After I weed out all the people who submit weak writing and bad premises, I'm left with the people who have good ideas and can write well. THAT'S when personal preference comes in. If I love an idea and it's totally up my alley and in line with my interests and I'd PREFER to have that book on my list, but the writing isn't there, I won't take it on because I doubt a lot of editors would be interested in this competitive market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meradeth &#8212; Personal preference operates on a level far above and beyond what I deal with in the slush. 99% of the queries I get, I&#8217;ll reject because the writing isn&#8217;t strong enough or the idea isn&#8217;t saleable. I&#8217;m not saying that &#8220;not for me&#8221; is the euphemism for weak writing across the board, but it is the most frequent reason for rejection for me. After I weed out all the people who submit weak writing and bad premises, I&#8217;m left with the people who have good ideas and can write well. THAT&#8217;S when personal preference comes in. If I love an idea and it&#8217;s totally up my alley and in line with my interests and I&#8217;d PREFER to have that book on my list, but the writing isn&#8217;t there, I won&#8217;t take it on because I doubt a lot of editors would be interested in this competitive market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
