<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When To Tell Instead of Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/</link>
	<description>A place for people who love, read and write children's literature.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:53:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-36235</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-36235</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;show not tell&quot; is just writer-jargon for &quot;You didn&#039;t get it right.&quot;
I&#039;ve read the Harry Potter series once. I didn&#039;t notice an annoying amount of telling, because the interesting parts were shown, with plenty of vivid detail. 

It&#039;s easy in writing to get caught up in &quot;showing&quot; everything. I think that&#039;s contributed to the backlash against &quot;-ly.&quot; Writers have been repeatedly told &quot;show, not tell,&quot; so they feel they can&#039;t simply say, &quot;she said.&quot; 

Not every minute detail needs to be shown to the reader. In between showing and telling there&#039;s also another concept, of &quot;conveying.&quot; What is the purpose of all the showing? If it doesn&#039;t convey some emotion or meaning to the story, then it&#039;s fluff. If it does, then it doesn&#039;t matter if you show or tell. If a &quot;telling&quot; statement sets a tone, or supports the pace of the action, then it works.

I have never been able to work with the concept of show not tell. I think about scenes, actions, visuals, vivid details and word choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;show not tell&#8221; is just writer-jargon for &#8220;You didn&#8217;t get it right.&#8221;<br />
I&#8217;ve read the Harry Potter series once. I didn&#8217;t notice an annoying amount of telling, because the interesting parts were shown, with plenty of vivid detail. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy in writing to get caught up in &#8220;showing&#8221; everything. I think that&#8217;s contributed to the backlash against &#8220;-ly.&#8221; Writers have been repeatedly told &#8220;show, not tell,&#8221; so they feel they can&#8217;t simply say, &#8220;she said.&#8221; </p>
<p>Not every minute detail needs to be shown to the reader. In between showing and telling there&#8217;s also another concept, of &#8220;conveying.&#8221; What is the purpose of all the showing? If it doesn&#8217;t convey some emotion or meaning to the story, then it&#8217;s fluff. If it does, then it doesn&#8217;t matter if you show or tell. If a &#8220;telling&#8221; statement sets a tone, or supports the pace of the action, then it works.</p>
<p>I have never been able to work with the concept of show not tell. I think about scenes, actions, visuals, vivid details and word choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kidlit.com &#183; First Line Winner Analysis</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-24665</link>
		<dc:creator>Kidlit.com &#183; First Line Winner Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-24665</guid>
		<description>[...] a much more active choice. You can, of course, use telling to reinforce key ideas occasionally (see good telling vs. bad telling) but I wouldn&#8217;t recommend as the first line. Still, I would keep reading [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a much more active choice. You can, of course, use telling to reinforce key ideas occasionally (see good telling vs. bad telling) but I wouldn&#8217;t recommend as the first line. Still, I would keep reading [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Faulkner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Showing &#38; Telling</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-17811</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Faulkner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Showing &#38; Telling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 15:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-17811</guid>
		<description>[...] are a couple of good posts today on &#8220;Show Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221;, that age-old mantra cited in just about every writing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are a couple of good posts today on &#8220;Show Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221;, that age-old mantra cited in just about every writing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taft</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-7761</link>
		<dc:creator>taft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-7761</guid>
		<description>Really good stuff, thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good stuff, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Show and Tell show and tell — Chocolate and Vodka</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-7697</link>
		<dc:creator>A Show and Tell show and tell — Chocolate and Vodka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-7697</guid>
		<description>[...] When To Tell Instead of Show?, Mary Kole? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When To Tell Instead of Show?, Mary Kole? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adventures in Children's Publishing</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-7693</link>
		<dc:creator>Adventures in Children's Publishing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-7693</guid>
		<description>This was a thought-provoking post. I spent several days stewing about your points and some of the things Michael Bourret wrote on telling versus showing in his recent manuscript submissions, and couldn&#039;t resist putting it all together tonight in a blog post. Hope you don&#039;t mind if I included a number of your examples. 

http://childrenspublishing.blogspot.com/2010/06/deciding-when-to-show-and-when-to-tell.html

Thanks so much,

Martina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a thought-provoking post. I spent several days stewing about your points and some of the things Michael Bourret wrote on telling versus showing in his recent manuscript submissions, and couldn&#8217;t resist putting it all together tonight in a blog post. Hope you don&#8217;t mind if I included a number of your examples. </p>
<p><a href="http://childrenspublishing.blogspot.com/2010/06/deciding-when-to-show-and-when-to-tell.html" rel="nofollow">http://childrenspublishing.blogspot.com/2010/06/deciding-when-to-show-and-when-to-tell.html</a></p>
<p>Thanks so much,</p>
<p>Martina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Rose</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-7657</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 03:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-7657</guid>
		<description>This was a very helpful post. From the sound of things, &quot;telling&quot; is good when it directs the reader, simplifies things, varies the sentence structure a bit, or simply &quot;sounds right.&quot; It&#039;s nice to hear that it&#039;s okay sometimes to plainly tell the reader what&#039;s going on, rather than always strain to show every single moment of the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very helpful post. From the sound of things, &#8220;telling&#8221; is good when it directs the reader, simplifies things, varies the sentence structure a bit, or simply &#8220;sounds right.&#8221; It&#8217;s nice to hear that it&#8217;s okay sometimes to plainly tell the reader what&#8217;s going on, rather than always strain to show every single moment of the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franziska Green</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-7653</link>
		<dc:creator>Franziska Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 19:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-7653</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Edna. What you say backs up what Kellie said about PBs too. Makes me happy too, as I kept the &#039;telling&#039; part in my PB (the one another critiquer told me I had to get rid of).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Edna. What you say backs up what Kellie said about PBs too. Makes me happy too, as I kept the &#8216;telling&#8217; part in my PB (the one another critiquer told me I had to get rid of).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dirtywhitecandy</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-7646</link>
		<dc:creator>dirtywhitecandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-7646</guid>
		<description>Terrific post. Jane Austen does &#039;good telling&#039; and summarising the whole time in Pride and Prejudice. It&#039;s still vivid and absorbing. I&#039;m tweeting this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrific post. Jane Austen does &#8216;good telling&#8217; and summarising the whole time in Pride and Prejudice. It&#8217;s still vivid and absorbing. I&#8217;m tweeting this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edna</title>
		<link>http://kidlit.com/2010/06/23/when-to-tell-instead-of-show/comment-page-2/#comment-7636</link>
		<dc:creator>Edna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 06:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kidlit.com/?p=1581#comment-7636</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed this blog post immensely. Thanks, Mary and Melissa! Someone asked for thoughts on picture books, so as an author/illustrator, I&#039;d like to address the topic. IMHO, the adage &quot;show, don&#039;t tell&quot; is mistakenly adopted as common wisdom for PB&#039;s, sending newbie PB writers down a path littered with extraneous adjectives and flat story arcs.

A compelling story with enticing page turns and growing, climactic tension and satisfying resolution within 32 pages, at under 800 words, IS a tall order. But it can be accomplished with &#039;good telling&#039; because much of the &#039;showing&#039; is done through the illustrations themselves.

In the iconic PB, &#039;Where The Wild Things Are,&#039; a healthy dose of telling is interspersed with Sendak&#039;s mesmerizing illustrations. From pages 15 to 19, one sentence carries Max (and the reader) from one place to another: &#039;That very night in Max&#039;s room a forest grew and grew until his ceiling hung with vines and the walls became the world all around.&#039; The reader is transported to a lush, magical setting described primarily through pigment.

Lastly, rhythm and pacing or &#039;beat&#039; is a significant ingredient in PB&#039;s. The story should sound good to our ears. With &#039;good telling,&#039; these same words also propel the story forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this blog post immensely. Thanks, Mary and Melissa! Someone asked for thoughts on picture books, so as an author/illustrator, I&#8217;d like to address the topic. IMHO, the adage &#8220;show, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; is mistakenly adopted as common wisdom for PB&#8217;s, sending newbie PB writers down a path littered with extraneous adjectives and flat story arcs.</p>
<p>A compelling story with enticing page turns and growing, climactic tension and satisfying resolution within 32 pages, at under 800 words, IS a tall order. But it can be accomplished with &#8216;good telling&#8217; because much of the &#8216;showing&#8217; is done through the illustrations themselves.</p>
<p>In the iconic PB, &#8216;Where The Wild Things Are,&#8217; a healthy dose of telling is interspersed with Sendak&#8217;s mesmerizing illustrations. From pages 15 to 19, one sentence carries Max (and the reader) from one place to another: &#8216;That very night in Max&#8217;s room a forest grew and grew until his ceiling hung with vines and the walls became the world all around.&#8217; The reader is transported to a lush, magical setting described primarily through pigment.</p>
<p>Lastly, rhythm and pacing or &#8216;beat&#8217; is a significant ingredient in PB&#8217;s. The story should sound good to our ears. With &#8216;good telling,&#8217; these same words also propel the story forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

