Alright. We are back in the saddle with some regular thoughts I have. Here, I want to explain my philosophy on full requests. I only request full manuscripts, not partials. Part of it is the same rationale as why I say you should send 10 sample pages with every query, regardless of an agency’s submission guidelines: instant gratification.
Imagine if I followed the partial request plan of some agents:
- Ask for the first 30 pages, evaluate
- As for the next 50/70 pages, evaluate
- Ask for the next 100/150 pages, evaluate
- Ask for the full
This is a bit extreme, but I have seen all sorts of iterations of this. Why bother? Well, here’s the rationale. An agent who asks for a lot of partials ultimately ends up rejecting fewer fulls, because their decision process is long and fewer manuscripts get all the way to the full request. On the other hand, there are also agents who request a full after reading only the query. They probably reject the vast majority (~99%) of their fulls, since the first time they see a writing sample is when they get a full manuscript. I request a full after reading the query and the first 10 pages. I reject a vast majority of my full manuscripts, but not nearly as many as the person who reads only a query and asks for the full.
The one downside to asking for a full is that, to a writer, a full request is a Big Deal. It is More Serious and More Important than a partial request. I wish this wasn’t the case. I only request a full so that I can read through the first 30, 50, 70, 100, 150, etc. etc. etc. and keep reading until a) the quality of the writing takes a nosedive, b) the plot stops making sense, c) the story takes some kind of bizarre turn, d) the characters warp, e) I lose interest. All of these things, unfortunately, happen sometimes. However, sometimes they don’t!
There are a million reasons to stop reading a manuscript but there are also a million reasons to keep reading. With requesting a full and not a partial, I don’t have to stop, ask for more, stop, ask for more. I can read for as long as I’m riveted and, if that extends to the end of the manuscript, I’m a very happy agent. With a full at my disposal, I’m free to take my time, have my process, really dig in and mull things over without going back and forth with the writer.
I wouldn’t advocate sending a full when asked for a partial, like I’d suggest you send a writing sample anyway, but I just hope you understand a little bit more of what goes through my mind and exactly what a full request from me means.
-
Thank you for this post, Mary. I’m going to remember to keep things in perspective when an agent (or editor) has a full. I wish I would have done that a few years ago when an editor requested a full on a chapter book of mine. I thought it meant BIG THINGS WERE TO COME. Although I got a nice personal rejection with some great tips for improvement, I was heartbroken.
P.S. You always write posts that writers really care about! (me, anyway.)
-
Mary, thanks for the reminder. I hope anybody that’s been around the block a time (or ten) realizes this. What’d be nice would be if agents (regardless of partials or fulls) in form rejections indicated where they stopped reading. I realize this probably would open the gates to extra questioning (which hopefully could be stemmed by a non-contact entreaty), but as a writer, it would be a quite useful piece of info that doesn’t (I imagine) take much time (b/c the form rejection on a partial/full is absolutely brutal to the psyche).
For example, if you stopped on an early page, I’ll probably realize you don’t like my writing style enough, whereas if it’s later on, there’s something more likely structural to the story (pacing, logic, etc.)
-
Thanks for the agent’s viewpoint - it is helpful to know this. I do agree though, it’s frustrating to get form rejections.
An idea: what if agents had a standard rejection form with 5 or 6 one sentence categories. Depending on the ms, the agent would check off the appropriate sentence.
Weak beginning
Lost midway
Weak ending
Not structurally sound
Writing craft needs honing
Storyline doesn’t interest meMaybe include a statment at the end that you are unable to field any questions.
Wishful thinking!
-
good reminder. my first novel i used to get all excited when the word “full” was in the body of an email from an agent. I’d do my poor excuse of the snoopy dance and send it off. lol. ack. to think of all the things I’ve learned since then : ) it seems like there’s always something new to learn in writing.
-
Hello Mary,
Thanks so much for the advice. I’ve found these agent blogs to be a well of such wonderful information, suggestions and such but it can be confusing sometimes, too. I went through a submission period for my first manuscript, had a few partial requests and then rejections, stopped for a while, re-wrote, and am now ready to get back in it. All the while I’ve read the agents’ blogs and some say, “Follow the submission guidelines!!” and I see yours says to send in a sample regardless, which I much prefer to do, but I’m curious that if they say, “Follow the submission guidelines!!” and you send in a sample where one was not asked, the agent won’t stamp a big FAIL on the sample before even reading the first line?Again, thanks so much for help!!
-
Well, this makes sense and also helps with the heartache of having a full rejected. At least a little. Thanks for posting this. I can’t believe I’ve just now discovered this site. This is a wonderful resource and I plan on going through all the past posts. Thanks again.
-
I suspect that with e-mail becoming a preferred method of communicating in the business world, more submissions will be sent electronically instead of in hard copy. This being the case, I would guess it would be just as easy for agents/publishers to ask for fulls - but perhaps that’s just wishful thinking on my part.
Thanks for the insight!
-
Yes, speaking as a writer, a full request is a Big Deal. And, despite the let-down with a rejection, I’d rather risk it and send the full for the reason you listed. If an agent likes what they’ve read, they’ll keep reading while it’s fresh. As a reader, I want to be able to inhale the entire book in one sitting–I can’t do that with a partial.
-
I will then, Mary, definitely. Go bold or go home, right? I have another, non-request related question for you. With writer websites, what are your thoughts on posting sample chapters for non-published or non-represented writers? Would it be like giving away the milk without getting the cow sold or do you think it’s a good way to generate attention?
Thanks so much for you reply. You’re awesome!
-
Very interesting topic.
I do wonder: How many “dings” does it take before a piece of writing is rejected? I suppose that varies based on voice, tone, overall quality of writing, plot, and any other thing I happen to be leaving out. I read on another post where you are willing to work with a “flawed” piece if there was something you liked about it. I hope many of your colleagues follow that philosophy!
-
Thanks Mary! I’ve been querying w/o sample pages…I will make the change!
-
Coming out of lurk to say thanks for the great post, Mary. It helps put the querying process into perspective. I think we, as writers, need to adjust our expectations on the fulls. A full request is still great, no matter how little the agent has reviewed, because it means that your concept and/or initial writing is interesting enough. But it’s not instant ticket to fame and fortune! lol If you’re rejected after a full request, you know that you need to reevaluate the writing- it’s not the concept, but something’s breaking down at some point. The far worse thing is no one wanting to request anything past the query!
Thank you for taking the time to give us such great information- it’s much appreciated.
-
Sometimes the reason(s) that a book doesn’t click with me as a reader are very subtle. I don’t just mean “the evil man is named the same as my beloved little boy” or “I hate Vegas and gambling, and it’s set in Vegas with a lot of gamblers.” (Although that is sometimes a factor!) And I don’t even mean grammar and spelling issues–although those are a deal-breaker for sure.
If the scenes seem to be those stock scenes that are in every movie shown on “Lifetime for Women” (my elderly mother lives with us, and that’s what she turns the TV to every chance she gets–yikes), then I’ll grow weary more quickly than if scenes are set in places I’ve always found interesting. For example, if a book has a really promising first few pages (it usually means they’ve had it polished up by sending it off to various contests and workshops and critique partners) but then degenerates into phone calls between women bemoaning the men in their lives and sitting around drinking, I’ll yawn. There are other ways to get the setup done or to advance the story, surely.
The book has to fulfill the promise it made to the reader–sometimes an implicit promise, but other times explicit, such as “I intend to find the person who poured ink on this watercolor!”–or the reader will call shenanigans. Many books have one of those Really Exciting Openings with shootings and bleeding and screaming, but the book doesn’t continue to escalate the tension, mostly because you CAN’T escalate. You have to dial back, pull the lens back to see a wider field, and explain. Then you’ll lose the readers who are in it for the chase scenes. And if you don’t make readers care about the character or identify with her/him in some way pretty soon, then they won’t care if he gets into a battle or falls off a cliff. I judge a goodly number of contests for RWA and MWA conferences, and these are things that make me mark down entries. Does that make sense? I’ll bet agents notice these same issues.
But agents can’t be expected to TELL you this. It takes me up to an hour, more likely twenty minutes, to write the comments on ONE entry in these contests. Typically, an entry is three chapters, around 25 pages, and it takes me a while to read that entry. Then I do some thinking, fill out the “rate 1 to 5″ sheet, and consider the comments. If it is an electronic entry, I use MS-Word’s “comments” feature to comment inside the entry. Man, that takes a while! I spend probably an hour to an hour and a half “doing” one entry. If a contest has seven entries in the category I am judging, that is a big commitment. I do it to “pay it forward” and to try to bribe God to give me a break in publishing. Agents have no such need to bribe God, so they can’t spend that kind of time. Besides, it could have been a visceral response to the work that decided them.
It’s very tough to figure out why I like _Catcher In the Rye_ and others hate it with the flames of a thousand suns. You have to chalk it up to “life” and go on as best you can.
My QUESTION (and I did have one), however, is: do you hate “thank-you notes” in e-mail from authors you’ve rejected but have said something nice about in the rejection? How about if I have another book, and I turn around and query you on that one right away? Is that a hopeless venture? (Some say not to query an agent right away on another book. Writer’s Digest used to tell us to do that through the 1970s and 1980s, but the rules have probably changed. *grin*)
-
Mary,
Thank you for providing such candid insight into your screening process for manuscripts.
Your advice regarding the inclusion of the first ten pages, whether requested or not, along with one’s query is a refreshing and invaluable revelation.
I will be sure to implement it in my next submission.Mario
-
What a great blog! I am slowly making my way through the world of writing and I would have absolutely made a huge deal out of a request for the full manuscript only to cover my face from embarrassment if nothing comes out of it. I’ll still celebrate, if it happens, but be mindful that it’s just a request. Thank you so much. I just saved this link to my favorites… Thanks again.
-
Thanks for this post Mary.
I finished my first MG novel about 6 months ago and the third agent I queried asked for the full manuscript. My brain was filled with fantastical outcomes - only to be pretty disappointed when it was rejected. I tried to reframe (after a few weeks of stewing about it) the situation to see it in a more positive light: 1. Agent liked the first chapter enough to request full, 2. Agent’s comments did help me to make improvements - especially in getting out of the character’s head a little more and 3. The agent turned out to actually be a human and I at least got the feeling that I wasn’t submitting to a black hole.
Thanks again for your perspective on this and it is good to remember to try not to take rejection personally.
Jennifer C.
-
Mary,
Thanks for the encouragement to send 10 pages regardless of an agency’s submission guidelines. I now feel I have professional permission to do what I’ve wanted to anyway! I wrestled with conficting adivce to ‘obey’ submission guidelines when they ask for only one page. (You don’t want to tick that agent off) And I know you guys are good at what you do, but one page? Yikes!
That’s a lot of pressure on us wannabes. -
I was just wondering if, since you request a full every time, do you ever flip to the end first just to see if things end up somewhere other than “And that’s when she realized, it was all a dream.”


40 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://kidlit.com/2010/01/04/full-requests/trackback/